• Every account number here was read in the Gambling Commission register, not copied off a casino footer.
• You get the licence holder behind each brand, which matters when two sites turn out to be one company.
• Each figure carries the name of the operator who printed it, so you can tell a game fact from a lobby claim.
• Where an operator publishes nothing, this page says so instead of filling the gap with a plausible number.

Table of contents

• Where the Game Is, and Who Holds the Licence
• What the Welcome Terms Actually Say About This Game
• Five Brands, Four Licence Holders
• What Each One Tells You up Front
• The Offer Gap Nobody Mentions
• Stakes Differ from Lobby to Lobby
• Deposits, Withdrawals and Checks
• Who We Would Not Send You To
• If None of These Fit
• Key Terms Used on This Page
• What Else Do Readers Ask

Where the Game Is, and Who Holds the Licence

Figures current as of 9 Oct 2026; the operator's live terms prevail.

What the Welcome Terms Actually Say About This Game

Five Brands, Four Licence Holders

Four companies stand behind the five lobbies.

Tek Fox Ltd runs MrQ on account 60629. Rank Interactive (Gibraltar) Ltd runs Grosvenor Casinos on 57924. Skill On Net Limited runs PlayOJO on 39326. Gamesys Operations Limited runs two of them, Virgin Games and Jackpotjoy, from a single account: 38905, which also carries Bally, Monopoly and Rainbow Riches among thirteen domains.

Why labour the point? Because two sites that agree are one witness when one company writes both. The terms pages of the two Gamesys brands come back as the same 5,592-byte shell, identical apart from a Cloudflare token. Their help-centre article on geo-blocking matches word for word. So their shared silence about this game's return is a single editorial decision, printed twice.

What Each One Tells You up Front

Two of the five print a return, and the two agree. MrQ shows "RTP: 96.70%" in its attributes block. Grosvenor Casinos shows "RTP = 96.70%" on its own game page. Both match what the client states about itself inside the studio demo.

PlayOJO is the odd one out.

Its key-data block carries nine labels and exactly one usable value, "Maximum Bet: £2/£5", which is the British regulatory cap rather than this game's grid. Two money fields come back broken. Where the return belongs, the page prints the literal string "RTP: undefined%". One caveat belongs with those two broken fields: our requests reach PlayOJO from outside Britain and the server answers with its Maltese shell, euros and all, so we report that block as what the server rendered to us rather than as what a British player is shown. The two Gamesys sites skip the subject entirely: across 105,065 bytes of the Virgin Games page, the token RTP occurs zero times.

The Offer Gap Nobody Mentions

All five keep this game out of the welcome offer, and three of them say so by naming a rival title. MrQ ties its 100 first-deposit spins to Big Bass Splash. Virgin Games states its spins are "only valid for the game Game of Thrones and cannot be transferred or used on any other game". Jackpotjoy points its own spins at Fishin Frenzy The Big Catch 2.

Wagering contribution is the wider gap, because all five leave it blank. MrQ comes closest, and it answers backwards: the operator publishes a roster of 214 excluded games, and that roster skips Razor Shark along with every other Push Gaming title, so the game counts in full by omission. A real answer, buried in a list of exclusions.

Stakes Differ from Lobby to Lobby

Five licensees give five accounts of one stake grid.

MrQ publishes "Min/Max Bet: 10p/£1". Grosvenor Casinos publishes "10p - £2". Virgin Games and Jackpotjoy each say bets "start from 10p" and then stop, naming no ceiling anywhere on the page. PlayOJO's minimum comes back as a broken value.

Every one of those sits below the client's own panel, which offers twelve total-bet steps running from 0.10 to 100.00 with 0.50 preselected. A British lobby is meant to sit lower, since the stake cap here is £5 per game cycle and £2 for players under 25. The puzzle is the spread between operators: £1 at one licensee, £2 at another, same game, same week, and neither page explains the difference.

One caution about MrQ, the most informative of the five. Of 38 catalogue pages we could parse, 15 publish a maximum stake above the British cap, some as high as £250, while another 15 correctly stop at £5.00. Its 96.70% remains the clearest statement any licensee makes about this title. It also comes from a site whose stake figures are partly stale.

Deposits, Withdrawals and Checks

Four of the five publish a withdrawal minimum. MrQ sets £10.00 and states "We do not charge fees for processing withdrawals". Grosvenor Casinos sets £5.00 per method and promises payment "into your bank within 15 minutes" once processed. The two Gamesys brands each require a £10 balance clear of wagering, then return funds to the depositing method. PlayOJO offers prose where the others offer thresholds.

Identity checks come before play rather than after a win, and MrQ puts it bluntly: "You will not be permitted to gamble until we have verified your name, address and date of birth." Grosvenor Casinos frames the same duty as a legal obligation to verify age, identity, address and location.

Gamesys Operations Limited was sanctioned on 22 November 2023 and paid £6,071,292, a figure that includes a divestment of £165,042. The same notice records that the Commission found no evidence of criminal monies being deposited. Both halves belong in one sentence, because either half alone misdescribes what happened.

Who We Would Not Send You To

We do not recommend PlayOJO as a place to check this game's numbers. Its page prints "85,475x Max Win Potential" with no source, date or hedge beside it, and the return field alongside reads undefined%. A lobby publishing an untraceable ceiling next to a broken return is a poor reference point, whatever the casino itself is like to use.

Grosvenor Casinos has the opposite problem, and a smaller one.

It prints "Max payout: £250,000" and "10p - £2" on the same strip, and those two pull apart under arithmetic: £250,000 is fifty thousand times five pounds, not two. The sum only closes at the full British cap, which its own published grid stops short of.

If None of These Fit

Pick on what you actually need. For the game's own figures in writing before you deposit, MrQ publishes the most, with the stake caveat above. For payment detail, Grosvenor Casinos lists six methods with a minimum against each. For a look at the reels at zero cost, skip the lobbies: the studio runs its own open demo, and every screenshot on this site came from it.